DocsComplyIQRead Findings & Close Gaps

Searchable, structured training for readers, crawlers, and AI assistants.

Public training path

Read Findings & Close Gaps

ComplyIQ · Beginner-friendly walkthrough

A ComplyIQ report is not just a list of failures. It separates what already meets the governing text, what clearly misses it, and what still needs judgement because the evidence is partial or ambiguous. Understanding the three finding columns Compliant: The...

Next best action

Preview the guidance here, then create an account to save workspaces, unlock guided execution, and continue inside the platform.

Sections

1 guided blocks

Read Time

3 min focused read

Coverage

188 searchable doc sections

complyiqfindingsgrounding scoreremediation

Section 1 of 1

How to Read the Report Like an Operator

complyiqfindingsgrounding scoreremediation

A ComplyIQ report is not just a list of failures. It separates what already meets the governing text, what clearly misses it, and what still needs judgement because the evidence is partial or ambiguous.

Compliant: The target document appears to satisfy the obligation with supporting evidence.

Non-compliant: The target text conflicts with, omits, or fails an obligation strongly enough to require remediation.

Possible confusion: The evidence is incomplete, inconsistent, or weak enough that a reviewer should inspect it manually before deciding.

Grounding score

Use the grounding score to understand how strongly the finding is anchored in source and target evidence.

Verification badges

Source verified and target verified badges tell you whether the relevant quotes were strongly grounded or still need review.

Evidence gaps

These show what the system could not confirm, which is often as important as the decision itself.

Download options

Completed runs can be reopened later and exported as HTML or JSON for distribution and integration.

Review order 1. Start with non-compliant findings. 2. Read the decision summary in plain language. 3. Check the obligation summary and source quote. 4. Inspect target evidence and evidence gaps. 5. Convert confirmed issues into remediation tasks. 6. Escalate low-confidence items for human review.
Pro Tip: Use possible confusion as triage, not failure

The possible confusion column is a review queue. Treat it as the list of items that need legal or policy judgement, not as automatic proof that the document is wrong.

Academy v4.0 · Interactive Documentation · Beginner Mode